On Independent School Education for Pupil Premium Children

 

The_Scotland_Street_School_Museum_(Glasgow)_(3816540623).jpg

In this morning’s Daily Telegraph Shaun Fenton the headmaster of Reigate Grammar School writes that:

We should increase social mobility by using state funding to open access to independent schools. Independent schools should be challenged to educate even more disadvantaged young people… My proposition is that the partial state funding should be for those who qualify for the Pupil Premium.

Fenton points out that this could only ever be a small part of the educational jigsaw, I wonder if his idea could make a difference to educational disadvantage and/or social mobility? He thinks these schools will need to expand to take an increase in numbers and it is this that makes the argument interesting.

Are our ‘great’ independent schools scaleable? Have they got the staff and indeed the facilities to accept, say, twice as many pupils? Many have the grounds in which they could build… Do they have the funds necessary to subsidise what, comparatively little, money they would get from the state?

Would it increase social mobility? If it did, what does that say about our education system? Is it the quality of education or more about ‘the old school tie’? Clearly it would be something that could annoy some of the middle classes, priced out of private schools by ever higher fees, and not poor enough to qualify for these new places. Would they not also be annoyed to see the establishment to be still drawn from the same schools but involving just the super rich and the poor?

Is it the quality of school that makes the difference to social mobility or is it down to the social capital of the parents and their networks that makes the most difference? In other words are these schools truly great or are they the beneficiaries of truly ‘great’ dynastic intakes that know how the establishment works and ensure it replicates itself? Would the ‘poorer intake’ in great numbers become socially mobile or would they lack the contacts necessary to make this a possibility?

Would the pupil premium intake be chosen via academic selection? If so, who would ensure they had the pre-education to pass the common entrance exam etc?

And finally…

What would happen to one of these schools if it expanded exponentially to include a majority of pupil premium kids, say 75%, would the school be the same? Would well-to-do parents want their darling offspring to mix with the hoi-poloi especially those who have chosen the independent sector deliberately to ensure that their kids don’t mix with the poor and certainly not in such large numbers?

 

3 thoughts on “On Independent School Education for Pupil Premium Children

  1. anotherwisemonkey

    I was educated at a private secondary school but was at the bottom of the demographic financially and in terms of class. My parents’ journey has been downwardly mobile and we were never part of any elite social or work network. I benefitted from a free university education but crippling student loans, and have taught for 15 years in the state sector, running a department for 13. Living in London, I still only part-own my small flat due to shared ownership. I came from a considerably more financially healthy starting point than a pupil premium child, but have considerably less materially than my parents did and still do, so I am sadly sceptical that this idea will increase social mobility. It perhaps has at its heart a mistaken belief that the poor have a lack of ambition, which could be erased by exposure to it. What are your thoughts on this?

    Like

    Reply
  2. annettehardysblog

    Many interesting and pertinent questions here. One thing we should avoid doing is lumping all independent schools together. Well-to-do parents of children at top public schools might well object to an influx of the “hoi-polloi” but at an independent day school such as my son’s in Bristol, I don’t think parents have chosen the school so that their children don’t have to mix with the poor; rather they have chosen it to give their children a high quality academic education combined with good sports and co-curricular provision. Parents at such schools do a wide range of jobs and many children are there thanks to bursaries. I doubt these parents would object to children from even poorer backgrounds being given the opportunity to attend, provided of course this didn’t put the fees up!

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s